Paniculite eosinofílica pode ser desencadeada por muitos fatores; aqui os autores descrevem a síndrome em conseqüência de injeções intramusculares de compostos de antimônio para tratamento de leishmaniose tegumentar americana em três pacientes. Todos eles desenvolveram lesões em placa, profundamente infiltradas, no local da injeção antimonial. A histopatologia mostrou acentuado infiltrado inflamatório da hipoderme com numerosos eosinófilos. O estudo imunológico não demonstrou imunoglobulinas ou frações do complemento nas lesões. O diagnóstico final foi de paniculite eosinofílica ocorrendo como efeito colateral da terapia antimonial. O mecanismo patogênico dessa paniculite não pôde ser definido. As hipóteses sugeridas foram de lesão induzida por fenômeno físico - a pressão exercida pelo volume do líquido injetado - ou de uma reação alérgica ao antimônio.

Eosinophilic panniculitis may be induced by several triggering factors and this syndrome is described here following the intramuscular injection of antimonial compounds for treatment of American muco-cutaneous leishmaniasis. Three patients, treated with intramuscular injections of pentavalent antimony (Glucantime®) were studied through clinical examination, histopathology and immunologic methods. The three patients developed deep infiltrated plaques at the site of antimony injection. Histopathology disclosed a prominent inflammatory infiltrate of the subcutaneous fat with numerous eosinophils. Immunologic studies could not detect immunoglobulins or complement fractions in the lesions. The final diagnosis was eosinophilic panniculitis occurring as a side-effect of antimonial therapy. The pathogenesis was not clear and it is suggested that the disease could be induced by a physical factor such as pressure or an immunological reaction to antimony.

Cutaneous biopsies (n = 94) obtained from 88 patients with American tegumentary leishmaniasis were studied by conventional and immunohistochemical techniques. Specimens were distributed as active lesions of cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 53) (Group I), cicatricial lesions of cutaneous leishmaniasis (n = 35) (Group II) and suggestive scars of healed mucosal leishmaniasis patients (n = 6) (Group III). In addition, active cutaneous lesions of other etiology (n = 24) (Group C1) and cutaneous scars not related to leishmaniasis (n = 10) (Group C2) were also included in the protocol. Amastigotes in Group I biopsies were detected by routine histopathological exam (30.2%), imprint (28.2%), culture (43.4%), immunofluorescence (41.4%) and immunoperoxidase (58.5%) techniques; and by the five methods together (79.3%). In Group II, 5.7% of cultures were positive. Leishmanial antigen was also seen in the cytoplasm of macrophages and giant cells (cellular pattern), vessel walls (vascular pattern) and dermal nerves (neural pattern). Positive reaction was detected in 49 (92.5%), 20 (57%) and 4 (67%) biopsies of Groups I, II and III, respectively. Antigen persistency in cicatricial tissue may be related to immunoprotection or, on the contrary, to the development of late lesions. We suggest that the cellular, vascular and neural patterns could be applied in the immunodiagnosis of active and cicatricial lesions in which leishmaniasis is suspected.

De julho de 1984 a setembro de 1986, 105 casos de leishmaniose cutânea foram estudados numa localidade situada na imediata vizinhança da área urbanizada da região metropolitana da cidade do Rio de Janeiro. A ocupação do sítio deu-se aproximadamente há 20 anos, mas os primeiros casos foram registrados somente seis meses antes do início de nosso estudo. Os casos eram quase que exclusivamente cutâneos, da forma clínica ulcerada com um e seis meses de evolução. O teste de Montenegro foi positivo em todos os casos e anticorpos antileishmania foram detectados por imunofluorescência indireta em 74,3% dos pacientes. A demonstração do parasito foi obtida em 69,5%. Animais domésticos infectados foram facilmente encontrados: 32% dos cães examinados e 30,8% dos equinos mostravam presença de leishmânia em lesões ulceradas. Parasitos isolados, tanto de casos humanos como de cães e equinos, foram imulogicamente caracterizados e identificados com L. b. braziliensis. Da população de flebotomíneos encontrados 73% eram de Lutzomyia intermedia capturados principalmente com iscas humanas e de animais domésticos. Nossas observações sugerem que esta é uma área de estabelecimento recente da infecção por L. b. braziliensis e que a transmissão ocorre provavelmente tanto no peridomicílio como no interior das habitações.

From July 1984 to September 1986, 105 cases of American cutaneous leishmaniasis were studied in a locality closely situated to an urbanized area of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Settement in this area was established at least 20 years ago but the first cases were noted six months prior to the beginning of this study. Cases were almost exlusively cutaneous and ulcerated, with one to six months of evolution. Montenegro's skin tests were positive in all cases and anti-Leishmania antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence test in 74.3% of the patients. Parasites were demonstrated in 69.5% of cases. Domestic animals were easily found infected; 32% of the examined dogs and 30.8% of the examined equines were positive to the presence of Leishmania in cutaneous ulcerated lesions. Parasite isolates from human, dog andequines were immunologically characterized and identified as L. b. braziliensis. 73,0% of the sandfly population were Lutzomyia intermedia mainly caught on human baits and on domestic animals. Our observations suggest that this is an area of recent established L. b. braziliensis infection and that transmission probably occurs indoors or outdoors close to the houses.